1803
The schoolmaster's song
The first account of that morning was not written by a priest, and it was not written in prose. It was a song. The village schoolmaster made it immediately after, five stanzas of verse, and he had been in the church and seen the whole of it with his own eyes. He was a worshipper of Siva. Everything printed since has been built on what he composed that day: the hour before noon, the open doors of the niche, the cloud that gathered behind her, the tears, the hands reaching out until they touched the walls. When a Jesuit set the account down in print a century later, he chose to give “the substance of the song and its commentary, leaving aside the poetry and the rhythm”. The story survives. The verse of it did not.
In English
“A first account, in verse and in five stanzas, was composed immediately after the events it relates. Its author, wholly a pagan and a schoolmaster at Vadakencoulam, had seen them with his own eyes. A second account, signed by one Sebastian Pillai, reproduces the first exactly, paraphrases it and completes it. The writer does not give himself out as a witness; he rests his account on the spoken testimony of the spectators who saw the scene unfold with their own eyes.”
What this source establishes
The whole dot: the FIRST record of the 1803 weeping was a five-stanza song, made straight after the event by the village schoolmaster, an eyewitness, whom Dessal identifies overleaf as a worshipper of Siva. Read the page to the end and it also says why the verse is not quoted here: Dessal prints “la substance du chant et de son commentaire, abstraction faite de la poésie et du rythme” — the substance, with the poetry stripped out. The song's own words survive in no book we hold.