01 / 10
1775–1838
The years no Jesuit came
For sixty-three years no Jesuit served this parish. It was not abandoned. Priests came from Goa under the Bishop of Cochin, and the roll of them runs without a gap: Deva Varadhanar, Ignatius, John Louis Cardoza and their successors. The feast was kept, the children were baptised, the dead were buried. And the village did more than hold on. From about 1780 it became “the sole centre of the inland mission”, with four divisional centres set under it, Sendamangalam, Andipatti, Kamanayakkanpatti and the village itself, served by priests from Cochin who “did their best to keep up the foundations already existing” until they made over the whole charge, in 1837, to the first new Jesuits at Palamcottah. Through all of it, the most extraordinary thing that has ever happened here happened in the middle of that time.
02 / 10
after 1775
The father they would not let go
They never let go of Thomassini. In his lifetime he had won them by his gentleness, he had finished their church, and he was the last Jesuit they would have for sixty-three years. He had died away from the village and was buried elsewhere, but his own people “raised a monument in their midst” and kept his memory as a saint's. Ninety years after his death a Jesuit writing about this district still used the present tense: “The Christians venerate him as a saint, give his name to their children, and visit his tomb with an extreme devotion.” Even those who were not Christians, he added, called on him in their troubles, holding that his intercession brought the rain down on their harvests.
03 / 10
1803
A Friday forenoon in Aippasi
On the forenoon of Friday, 21 October 1803, in the Tamil month of Aippasi of the year 979, a man named Savarimuthu Pillai, who had come from Tirunelveli to see Mr Bilderbeck, a European settled in the village, went into the church to pray. The statue of Our Lady of the Assumption stood above the altar in a recess closed by a double door, and that morning both its leaves were open. As he knelt, a thin transparent cloud gathered behind her and wrapped her round. Her eyes lifted toward heaven and filled, and the tears ran down her cheeks; her face turned sorrowful; and her folded hands parted and stretched out until they touched the walls of the recess. And every other statue on the altar, the record says, “expressed compassion and mourning”. “I am the subject of an illusion,” he thought. He looked again, harder, and it had not stopped.
NoteThe two earliest printed accounts give this Friday as 21 October, and 21 October 1803 was a Friday; the feast is kept on the 22nd and 23rd.
04 / 10
1803
The bell at the wrong hour
The catechist Madurendira Annaviyar climbed up to the altar and wiped her face, and the tears came again, and would not stop. Then they rang the bell. It was not an hour at which the bell was ever rung, and the whole village came in from the fields and the houses to see why. They stood and looked, and then they wept and prayed, and sang the old penitential chant that is sung when a people is afraid: “Parce Domine, parce populo tuo.” Spare, O Lord, spare your people. And as they prayed, the statue and all the other images “resumed their customary aspect”, and the face above the altar was an ordinary carved face again.
05 / 10
1803
Her eyes like stars
To be sure of it, Savarimuthu went for the catechist Yagappar Pillai. The catechist came into the church and saw the Mother of God wrapped in smoke and darkness, her face desolate, her arms open, her eyes raised to heaven and running with tears. Then they sent in haste for Mr Bilderbeck's daughter, Henriette, and the girl ran to the church and saw it in her turn. Looking into Our Lady's face, she saw her eyes “like stars”, and the tears breaking from them so abundantly that “they ran to the ground and wetted it”; and the statues of the saints, all of them together, bowing their heads in sorrow.
06 / 10
1803
The schoolmaster's song
The first account of that morning was not written by a priest, and it was not written in prose. It was a song. The village schoolmaster made it immediately after, five stanzas of verse, and he had been in the church and seen the whole of it with his own eyes. He was a worshipper of Siva. Everything printed since has been built on what he composed that day: the hour before noon, the open doors of the niche, the cloud that gathered behind her, the tears, the hands reaching out until they touched the walls. When a Jesuit set the account down in print a century later, he chose to give “the substance of the song and its commentary, leaving aside the poetry and the rhythm”. The story survives. The verse of it did not.
07 / 10
1803–1817
The family in the church that morning
The Bilderbecks were flesh and blood, and they can be named. Christopher Bilderbeck, born about 1758, was a merchant of European descent who settled at Vadakkankulam late in the eighteenth century and died here in 1817. They were people of standing, holding the revenue-farm of Nangunery; and Henriette, who had examined the statue that morning, was his daughter. A son, John, was born in 1809, six years after the weeping; and when John died in 1880 an English missionary journal recorded of him that he had been “born in India… of a Roman Catholic family, and trained for the priesthood of that Church.” The family that stood in this church that morning left a paper trail of its own, in Protestant hands, kept by people with no reason at all to flatter a Catholic shrine.
08 / 10
1838
Those who could still be asked
When the Jesuits came back in 1838, that morning was still inside living memory. Thirty-five years lay between the fathers who arrived and the day itself, and many of the people who had been in the church were still alive to be asked. The first of them to reach Vadakkankulam found themselves, as a Jesuit of this mission afterwards wrote, “as if wrapped and steeped in the powerful atmosphere of that tradition”; they had only to listen to what the village willingly told them to learn the whole of it, and they became in their turn its witnesses. And there was one thing the village always put in, which no one who ever told the story left out: how the church had filled and the many candles of the altar were lit and everyone was on their knees, and how someone went up to wipe the tears and could not stop them or make them less. That helpless kindness was what broke the people. They beat their breasts, they said “Lord, have mercy on us,” and they sang the Salve Regina.
09 / 10
1905
He tried to move her hands
A hundred years after that morning a Jesuit of this mission came to see for himself. The village had made a working copy of the statue: wires and rods inside a hollow imitation, so that one pull raised the head, lifted the eyes to heaven, parted the hands and opened the arms, and a second pull put everything back again. “They kindly re-did the miracle for us,” he wrote. It did not go smoothly, and the man working it tangled his strings more than once. Then he went to the statue itself, standing alone in its place of honour above the tabernacle, and put his own hands on it. He tried to straighten the head, to lift the eyelids, to roll the eyes, and above all to separate those two hands carved from a single piece and force the rigid arms apart. Wasted labour. It was the dead resistance of raw matter, of a dried tree-trunk. He gave up what he called his usurped office of inquisitor of the Faith, and he gave it up gladly, and knelt.
10 / 10
1914
Three witnesses, in three hands
For a long time it was thought the whole of that morning came down a single line: Léon Besse's La Mission du Maduré, printed at Trichinopoly in 1914, which gathered up the papers of the Madurai mission and set the parish's record of 1803 into print. It does not. Nine years before Besse, a Jesuit of this mission, Fr Dessal, had already printed the account in full; and in 1930 a life of Devasahayam, written in Malayalam and in another tradition entirely, recorded the same European woman examining the same three signs. Three witnesses, in three hands, none of them copying the others. It was never carried to Rome, and no commission has ever weighed it. But it reaches us the way this village has always carried it: a dated morning, named witnesses, and two hundred and twenty years of keeping the feast.
NoteThe weeping has never been submitted to Rome, and no Vatican commission has examined it. It reaches us in three independent printed accounts, the earliest from 1905, and it claims no more than a dated morning, named witnesses, and an unbroken feast.